Asbestos Policy recommendations
| Reference | Recommendation | Response | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRG1 | That the Council undertakes on site post inspections of asbestos work for 5% of completed works | Accepted | The sampling of asbestos work is now planned to take place |
| PRG2 | That clearer text is provided in the Asbestos Policy as to how residents can report asbestos concerns | Accepted | Clearer text has been provided in the policy |
| PRG3 | That the Asbestos Policy policy text should be amended to read that staff "must" know the asbestos policy rather than “should” know the policy | Accepted | The original draft was ambiguous as to the responsibility of Council staff to know the asbestos policy. This wording has been strengthened |
| PRG4 | That major incident reviews and learnings pertaining to property maintenance to be made public (with personal details removed) so residents can see transparency in action | Needs more work before being considered | This recommendation is in negotiation with residents and OCC officers |
Damp and Mould Policy recommendations
| Reference | Recommendation | Response | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRG5 | That the tone of the wording of the Damp and Mould Policy be amended as it was perceived to be negative towards residents | Accepted | The wording in the Damp and Mould policy has been amended to neutrally state the responsibility of residents and the Council to address damp and mould |
| PRG6 | It was noted in the original draft Damp and Mould Policy that damp and mould be addressed within a number of “working days”. Due to the impact of damp and mould upon health, as the tragic death of two-year Awaab Ishak in Rochdale in 2020 shows, it was recommended the word “working” be removed | Not accepted | Housing Board considered the cost implication and the capacity of OCC and ODS to address damp and mould if it was in “days” rather than “working days” as too high to accommodate |
| PRG7 | That it should be made clearer in the Damp and Mould Policy how residents can report damp and mould and how the Council will share information with residents on damp and mould | Accepted | The policy text is now clearer as to how residents can report damp and mould concerns |
Fire Policy recommendations
| Reference | Recommendation | Response | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRG8 | That residents in a flat affected by a fire press the fire alarm when leaving the block | Not accepted but influenced service design | On review by the Corporate Fire Safety Manager, it was clarified that the following wording will now be included in the policy under the narrative of a fire in a flat: "Residents should immediately evacuate the building and once safely outside, raise the alarm by contacting 999." |
| PRG9 | That residents know who to contact if there are concerns of flammable material being held in a flat or flats | Accepted | The Fire Safety policy now includes text that on communal notice boards, residents are advised who to contact if they are concerned flammable materials are being stored in neighbouring properties |
| PRG10 | That the Fire Safety Policy takes special consideration of residents who may have additional needs and are being supported by the Community Safety team | Accepted | The list of vulnerable residents has been extended to include residents being supported by the Community Safety team |
Disrepair Policy recommendations
| Reference | Recommendation | Response | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRG11 | As no responses were received and no recommendations to change the policy were offered by the PRG, it is recommended that the Disrepair Policy progresses in its current form | Accepted |
The Director of Housing and the Deputy Chief Executive (City and Citizens’ Services) - with the Deputy Chief Executive using delegated powers as Chair of the Housing Board - approved the Disrepair Policy |
| PRG12 |
PRG requests that:
|
Accepted | PRG4 to be taken to the Co-Design Group and OCC Officers for further work before being re-considered |