- Scope
-
Accessibility legislation (on legislation.gov.uk website) states that public sector websites must publish content in an accessible format, unless doing so would impose a disproportionate burden on the organisation. If that is the case, an assessment of the extent to which compliance with the accessibility requirement imposes a disproportionate burden must be carried out.
This is a Disproportionate Burden Assessment for the 63 Oxford Local Plan 2042 Preferred Options: Site Assessment documents which are in PDF format.
- Benefits of making accessible
-
The benefits of creating an HTML version of this PDF would be:
- a fully accessible version for all users to access
- an easily searchable and indexable version
- Burden of making accessible
-
The documents relate to the Regulation 18 Consultation for the 2042 Local Plan.The documents include a Sustainability Appraisal of 63 sites (as individual documents) which are potential site allocations. The appraisal is a technical assessment that includes colour-coding in tables and maps.
The expectation is that the documents are made publicly available as part of the Council’s statutory duties; however, due to the high volume of information, number of, and nature of the documents we do not deem it suitable to convert these documents into accessible versions.
- Other factors
-
Also relevant to this decision are that:
- We are legally required to make the documents available to the public, so the documents must be published on the Council’s website
- Thus far we have not received requests for additionally accessible versions of the documents in this folder when we have published similar versions before. We have taken steps to re-format to make as accessible as possible
- The document does meet accessibility requirements for a large number of users, although some groups will find it disproportionately difficult
- We will always assist with accessible versions on request
- Assessment
-
The site assessments include multiple elements including maps and tables. The text is formatted into columns, with colour-coded scores. These elements make accessibility difficult.
The documents can be upgraded or where not deemed to be required can be removed from the webpages, and we will provide suitable versions on request.
Having considered the estimated effort involved in creating accessible versions of these documents, we have concluded that the work required is beyond the resources available to us. This represents a disproportionate burden on the organisation.
- Date of assessment
-
27 June 2025